In an increasingly globally connected world, nonprofit organizations are as much at risk and vulnerable to cyber threats as large multinational corporations, if not more so. To keep cyber threats at bay, traditional security models have often relied on devices such as firewalls, virtual private networks (VPNs), and similar tools, often based on the underlying assumption that anyone inside the network is trusted by default. Zero Trust Architecture (ZTA) is based on the concept that nothing is trusted by default, whether it is an internal or external stakeholder. The model offers a fundamentally different approach: never trust, always verify. This approach is particularly critical, as nonprofits often handle sensitive donor information, volunteer and beneficiary data, and other confidential information that must always remain secure.
Why Nonprofits Are Attractive Targets
Even though nonprofits might have limited budgets, they are still attractive targets for cybercriminals, often because they hold a wealth of sensitive and valuable information. High-value assets that can be exploited include donor databases, payment records, and personally identifiable information (PII) of beneficiaries. Additionally, nonprofits that rely on volunteers, contractors, or third-party partners can also be at risk if their access controls are weak. These high-value assets can be exploited for financial gain, identity theft, or ransomware attacks. Once a cyberattack occurs, there can be an erosion of donor trust, with regulatory penalties potentially applied if data breaches occur.
Read the original article: