There remains a significant disparity in utilisation of resources between defensive and offensive cybersecurity technologies. When comparing the return on investment (ROI) for defensive and offensive investments, security experts discovered that offensive security routinely outperforms defensive security. For example, penetration testing not only identifies vulnerabilities, but it also addresses and seals potential access sites for hackers.
This recognition should drive organisations and their security leaders to consider why there is so little investment in offensive security solutions. Many CISOs recognise a clear market gap in offensive security tactics, with acquired tooling fatigue unable to satisfy the changing needs of modern enterprises.
CISOs must now look into how a data-driven approach may generate a proven ROI for each offensive security expenditure they make.
Data science and cybersecurity: A powerful duo
In an era of digital transformation and networked systems, cybersecurity incidents have increased tremendously. Businesses face a slew of dangers, including unauthorised access and malware attacks. To tackle this, dat
[…]
Content was cut in order to protect the source.Please visit the source for the rest of the article.
[…]
Content was cut in order to protect the source.Please visit the source for the rest of the article.
This article has been indexed from CySecurity News – Latest Information Security and Hacking Incidents
Read the original article: