The use of secure messaging applications has long been seen as the final line of defense against persistent digital surveillance in an era of widespread digital surveillance. This assumption is now being challenged by Germany’s domestic intelligence service, the Federal Office for the Protection of the Constitution, which, in conjunction with the Federal Office for Information Security, has jointly issued a rare advisory detailing a calculated cyberattack attributed to a state-backed adversary.
It is clear that the warning highlights a deliberate strategy to infiltrate private communications through deception, rather than technical exploits, targeting individuals who rely heavily on them. The agencies report that the operation targets high-ranking political decision-makers, senior military personnel, diplomatic representatives, and investigative journalists in Germany and across Europe. Its implications go beyond the compromise of individual accounts to include high-ranking officials and foreign diplomats.
Access to secure messenger profiles by unauthorized users could expose confidential information, sensitive professional networks, and trusted contact chains, which in turn could compromise entire institutional ecosystems.
As a result, the campaign does not rely on malware deployment or the exploitation of Signal platform vulnerabilities. It attempts to manipulate the application’s legitimate account recovery and verification features in order to achieve its objectives.
The attackers intend to quietly intercept private conversations and harvest contact information without triggering conventional security alarms by exploiting human trust rather than software vulnerabilities. The attack sequence reflects this strategy. The attackers are impersonating “Signal Support” or impersonating a fabricated assistance channel called a “Signal Security ChatBot” and contacting selected victims directly.
Receivers are pressured to divulge verification codes or PINs sent via SMS as a precaution against data loss or account suspension, under the pretense that the adversary will be able to take control of the account upon surrendering these credentials. Based on the initial findings, the joint advisory clarifies that the attack is not a result of technical compromise of the platform’s codebase or malicious payload deployment.
By combining carefully staged social engineering with Signal’s routine functionality, the operators are exploiting the trust users place in its privacy-centered design. By manipulating the standard account verification and recovery workflows, the attackers are able to induce their victims to divulge the very credentials that secure their communication.
In one documented scenario, a person impersonating an official support channel is referred to as “Signal Support” or “Signal Security Chatbot.”
The targeted organization receives messages alleging fabricated security irregularities and urges it to act immediately to prevent alleged data loss or account suspension.
By engineering urgency, recipients are prompted to disclose their Signal PINs or SMS verification codes, overriding caution. When the adversary possesses these credentials, they may re-register the account on infrastructure under their control, effectively transferring ownership of the account.
Such situations may result in the legitimate user being locked out and the intruder gaining unfettered
[…]
Content was cut in order to protect the source.Please visit the source for the rest of the article.
This article has been indexed from CySecurity News – Latest Information Security and Hacking Incidents
Read the original article: