<
div class=”field field–name-body field–type-text-with-summary field–label-hidden”>
<
div class=”field__items”>
<
div class=”field__item even”>
We’ve covered a lot of federal and state proposals that badly miss the mark when attempting to grapple with protecting young people’s safety online. These include bills that threaten to cut young people off from vital information, infringe on their First Amendment rights to speak for themselves, subject them (and adults) to invasive and insecure age verification technology, and expose them to danger by sharing personal information with people they may not want to see it.
Several such bills are moving through the California legislature this year, continuing a troubling years-long trend of lawmakers pushing similarly problematic proposals. This week, EFF sent a letter to the California legislature expressing grave concerns with lawmakers’ approach to regulating young people’s ability to speak online.
We’re far from the only ones who have issues with this approach. Many of the laws California has passed attempting to address young people’s online safety have been subsequently challenged in court and stopped from going into effect.
Our letter outlines the legal, technical, and policy problems with proposed “solutions” including age verification mandates, age gating, mandatory parental controls, and proposals t
[…]
Content was cut in order to protect the source.Please visit the source for the rest of the article.
Read the original article: