Digital Tracking Threats Extend Beyond Governments to Everyday Users

Technology policy challenges are increasingly being exposed in the debate over digital safety: measures that are intended to address one online risk are often used to raise another set of security and privacy concerns. Critics have warned that the collection of additional personal information could broaden surveillance capabilities and create new targets for abuse as governments push for stricter age-verification requirements and expanded identity checks. 

Separately, a pervasive wave of security threats is emerging at the level of the consumer, where mobile phone theft operations are exploiting weaknesses in the systems for accessing devices and recovering accounts.
Whether regulating oversight, privacy, or physical device security is a concern, these developments represent the growing reality of the digital ecosystem. 

Cybersecurity experts, governments, corporations, and cybersecurity professionals are no longer the only ones facing the risks associated with digital tracking and identity information. Increasingly, it is becoming a concern for technology providers, policymakers, and everyday users alike.

Digital tracking has become a topic of debate that has moved beyond privacy advocacy into the national security arena. 

Recent disclosures from US lawmakers suggest that the same commercial data ecosystem used for profiling consumers and targeting advertisements may also pose operational risks to military personnel.
As reported by Senator Ron Wyden, the US Central Command has been informed that it has received several threat reports regarding the exploitation of commercially available location data in order to monitor or potentially target American personnel deployed in active theaters of operation. 

In spite of the fact that military officials did not identify the responsible actors or particular locations involved, this revelation represents a significant escalation in concern regarding the market for commercial surveillance.
Researchers have long warned that location metadata obtained from smartphones, applications, and connected devices can reveal patterns, routes, and recurring gathering points through the collection of location metadata. 

Congress warns that this intelligence can be used to support kinetic threats, including drone strikes, missile attacks, and other forms of battlefield targeting, in addition to surveillance and counterintelligence activities.
Increasing scrutiny has been focused on the adtech and data brokerage sectors, where large volumes of geolocation data are routinely collected, aggregated, and resold.
Previously considered primarily a consumer privacy issue, this issue is now being examined as a strategic security vulnerability, particularly in light of historical incidents. 

The reports that have been reported that commercially acquired location data was used to track the movements of US Special Operations personnel toward a covert staging facility in Syria demonstrate how seemingly routine smartphone data can reveal sensitive military activities that go beyond their original purpose in revealing sensitive information.

There is a fundamental concern among lawmakers and security officials about not only isolated incidents, but also the architecture of the modern data economy itself.

Through GPS, Wi-Fi and cellular network interactions, as well as advertising identifiers embedded throughout countless applications, smartphones continually generate streams of location intelligence.
Upon collecting user activity records, brokers often aggregate,

[…]
Content was cut in order to protect the source.Please visit the source for the rest of the article.