Surprisingly, artificial intelligence is changing cybersecurity faster than expected. Some elite ethical hackers now wonder whether human-driven hacking contests will stay relevant much longer. Momentum built around this idea when someone prominent at Pwn2Own this year pointed to advanced AI systems possibly surpassing numerous expert analysts. Performance gaps might widen as these tools grow stronger.
Among those who took part in Berlin’s yearly Pwn2own contest, Valentina Palmiotti stood out – not just by name but by result. Though many go by handles online, she competes under the tag “Chompie,” a nickname familiar across security circles. Success came her way more than others’, marking her top among solo entrants. Instead of waiting for flaws to be misused, the event encourages finding hidden bugs first. Rewards follow when researchers expose weaknesses in digital tools that were not yet public knowledge.
This year’s competition handed out close to $1..3 million for spotting 47 previously unknown weaknesses in various software and systems. Because researchers shared the details with makers first, fixes arrived ahead of potential exploitation.
Midway through the event, Chompie exposed weaknesses across several platforms – some tied to Nvidia – securing significant rewards. Her method? Endless stretches of probing flaws, something she laughed about calling “zombie hacker mode,” where nights blurred into days thanks to sheer persistence and concentration.
Though today’s AI tools speed up code analysis and threat detection, Chompie sees a shift on the horizon. Her view: present systems boost efficiency, yet future versions may make several classic roles obsolete. What now requires teams might soon run on smarter algorithms alone.
Nowhere has scrutiny been more intense than around Claude Mythos, a powerful AI said to detect vast quantities of software weaknesses. The creators state it has uncovered countless security issues spanning many applications. Because of risks tied to abuse, only certain government bodies and cyber defense groups are allowed to use it. Access remains tightly controlled amid ongoing debate.
Some scientists see things differently.
A top Pwn2-Owned champion, Orange Tsai of Taiwan, treats artificial intelligence as a helpful tool instead of a substitute for people’s knowledge. Because it speeds up testing, new approaches get checked faster – this means more attacks can be studied quickly. Still, originality, gut instinct, and sideways leaps in logic stay within human reach only; these traits often spot flaws machines miss. Though tech advances, certain mental moves resist automation.
Though artificial intelligence is advancing, hackers now employ automation more often to speed up tasks like scanning networks, crafting phishing messages, or building malicious software. Yet a large number of breaches continue depending on older methods – manipulating people or stealing login details – instead of exploiting cutting-edge flaws.
Even with worries over automation, some specialists think artificial intelligence might boost digital defense by spotting flaws more quickly than hackers can act. Because systems evolve fast, teams protecting networks may rely on smart tools to stay ahead – provided those resources are used carefully and shared wisely.
This article has been indexed from CySecurity News – Latest Information Security and Hacking Incidents
Read the original article:
Related
