The “Engineering” Trap
In many organizations, there is a dangerous unspoken rule: The SOC handles endpoints and networks; Engineering handles APIs.
This silo creates a massive blind spot. We recently spoke with the Senior Manager of Security Engineering at a major insurance provider, who described this exact pain point. Before bringing in Salt Security, their API security was effectively an “engineering function.”
The SecOps team had world-class visibility into their laptops and servers via CrowdStrike, but their API traffic, the very lifeblood of their digital business, was a black box. They relied on a traditional WAF, logs, and SIEM.
The problem? As the customer noted, “These weren’t volumetric attacks or malformed requests… but behavioral attacks operating inside legitimate API usage patterns.”
The Visibility Gap: You Can’t Protect What You Can’t See
Before you can secure your APIs, you have to know they exist. This customer faced a common challenge: they lacked a “living view” of their API fabric.
Like many enterprises, they relied on their API Gateway for inventory. But gateways only see what is routed through them. They are blind to “shadow” endpoints, legacy versions, and direct-to-origin connections that bypass the gateway entirely.
The customer noted that while they could perform manual investigations via the gateway, they “lacked a complete, continuously updated inventory” required to spot drift or anomalies. By integrating Salt, they automatically generated a granular, real-time inventory of every API endpoint, including the ones the gateway missed, giving the SOC the map they needed to defend the territory.
The Limits of WAF + SIEM
The customer’s experience highlights a critical industry reality: Traditional stacks cannot catch modern API threats.
- WAFs look for bad signatures (SQLi, XSS).
- SIEMs aggregate logs.
- Business Logic Abuse (BOLA/IDOR) appears to be valid traffic to both.
The customer found that without a dedicated, AI-powered behavioral engine for API security, they couldn’t distinguish between a user aggressively using the platform and an attacker slowly enumerating IDs to scrape sensitive data.
Breaking the Silo with CrowdStrike + Salt
The turning point came when the customer stopped treating API security as a standalone problem.
By integrating Salt Security with CrowdStrike Falcon, they didn’t just buy a new tool; they expanded their existing ecosystem.
- Context, Not Just Alerts: Salt identifies the intent behind API traffic (the “who” and “why”).
- Unified Workflow: These insights are pushed into the CrowdStrike Falcon console.
- Actionable Response: Analysts can now detect API attacks in real time alongside endpoint signals, enabling faster, more confident remediation.
Future-Proofing: The AI Agent & MCP Wave
While this customer’s immediate goal was stopping human attackers, their architectural shift has prepared them for a much larger threat: Agentic AI.
The “logic abuse” patterns they detected, low-and-slow enumeration, unauthorized data scraping, are the exact behaviors AI Agents will automate at scale using the Model Context Protocol (MCP). By deploying Salt’s behavioral engine today, they haven’t just solved a current gap; they’ve inoculated their environment against the coming surge of machine-to-machine traffic that traditional WAFs will be completely blind to.
The Result: Operationalized Security
The customer’s feedback was clear: “We maximized our existing platform investment and simplified operations by avoiding yet another point tool.”
This is the future of API security. It isn’t about buying more dashboards for your team to ignore. It’s about feeding high-fidelity behavioral intelligence into the platforms you already trust. It’s about taking API security out of the “Engineering” silo and putting it right where it belongs: in the SOC.
If you want to learn more about Salt and how we can help you, please contact us, schedule a demo, or visit our website. You can also get
[…]
Content was cut in order to protect the source.Please visit the source for the rest of the article.
Read the original article: