For over 20 years, static application security testing (SAST) has been the foundation of secure coding. However, beneath the surface, many legacy SAST tools still operate using basic techniques such as regular expressions and lexical pattern matching; essentially, sophisticated versions of the Unix command grep. As a result, most SAST tools suffer from what I call “false positive fatigue.” These tools report every occurrence of a strcpy() (or similar) regardless of whether the buffer is mathematically proven to be safe.
This article explores an innovative method for detecting vulnerabilities using graph neural networks (GNNs). In contrast to viewing source code as a linear string of characters, GNNs represent code as a structured graph of logical and data-flow structures. As such, we can now develop models that understand how a user’s input at line 10 in the code ultimately relates to a database query at line 50, even when variable names are changed three times between those two points in the code.
![]()
Read the original article: