Tsao vs. Captiva: “Risk of Identity Theft” Theory Rejected

Read the original article: Tsao vs. Captiva: “Risk of Identity Theft” Theory Rejected


According to Bilzin Sumberg attorney Kelly Ruane Melchiondo, in order for a plaintiff to sue in a federal court, he must affirm an injury that the court is capable of remediating, rather than just issuing an advisory opinion and a connection between the defendant’s conduct and the actual injury. This principle is known as standing, […]

The post Tsao vs. Captiva: “Risk of Identity Theft” Theory Rejected appeared first on Heimdal Security Blog.


Read the original article: Tsao vs. Captiva: “Risk of Identity Theft” Theory Rejected