This article has been indexed from Deeplinks
Led by a group of senators that spent much of 2019 trying to change U.S. patent law for the worse, the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (PTO) has agreed to study the “current state of patent jurisprudence.” The details of the study make it clear that its proposers believe in a narrative created by patent owners, that the 2014 Alice case has introduced “uncertainty” into patent law.
That would be Alice v. CLS Bank, the Supreme Court case that made it clear you can’t get a patent on an abstract idea just by adding in generic computer language.
As we’ve told Congress before, the only ones experiencing “uncertainty” because of the Alice precedent are people and companies using weak software patents to demand money from others.
For people who actually work with and on software, the Alice precedent has produced more certainty than ever before. Software innovation in the past seven years has been extraordinary. In the U.S., since Alice, the software industry is experiencing record profits and levels of employment. It certainly helps that more baseless patent lawsuits are being thrown out by courts. Truly innovative companies that build stuff—rather than rely on software patents—are thriving.
In 2020, the great majority of software-related appeals where patent eligibility was at issue ended up with the patents being found invalid. That’s happening because of Alice—we can’t and we won’t let that progress get rolled back.
In our “Saved by Alice” project, we’ve told some of the stories of small businesses faced with extortionate demands from patent assertion entities claiming to have patented basic aspects of doing business. These small companies—often with a sole proprietor or just a handful of employees—were threatened by patent owners claiming wide-ran
[…]
Content was cut in order to protect the source.Please visit the source for the rest of the article.
Read the original article: Senators Push To Study “Unstable” Patent Law, While Patent Trolls Cheer Them On