Introducing Badger Swarm: New Project Helps Privacy Badger Block Ever More Trackers

<

div class=”field field–name-body field–type-text-with-summary field–label-hidden”>

<

div class=”field__items”>

<

div class=”field__item even”>

<

p class=”subhead”>Today we are introducing Badger Swarm, a new tool for Privacy Badger that runs distributed Badger Sett scans in the cloud. Badger Swarm helps us continue updating and growing Privacy Badger’s tracker knowledge, as well as continue adding new ways of catching trackers. Thanks to continually expanding Badger Swarm-powered training, Privacy Badger comes packed with its largest blocklist yet.

A line chart showing the growth of blocked domains in Privacy Badger’s pre-trained list from late 2018 (about 300 domains blocked by default) through 2023 (over 2000 domains blocked by default). There is a sharp jump in January 2023, from under 1200 to over 1800 domains blocked by default.

We continue to update and grow Privacy Badger’s pre-trained list. Privacy Badger now comes with the largest blocklist yet, thanks to improved tracking detection and continually expanding training. Can you guess when we started using Badger Swarm?

Privacy Badger is defined by its automatic learning. As we write in the FAQ, Privacy Badger was born out of our desire for an extension that would automatically analyze and block any tracker that violated consent, and that would use algorithmic methods to decide what is and isn’t tracking. But when and where that learning happens has evolved over the years.

When we first created Privacy Badger, every Privacy Badger installation started with no tracker knowledge and learned to block trackers as you browsed. This meant that every Privacy Badger became stronger, smarter, and more bespoke over time. It also meant that all learning was siloed, and new Privacy Badgers didn’t block anything until th

[…]
Content was cut in order to protect the source.Please visit the source for the rest of the article.

This article has been indexed from Deeplinks

Read the original article: