Academic researchers using commercial AI tools for literature review and idea generation are sending unpublished research questions, draft hypotheses, and proprietary domain knowledge into systems whose data handling they do not understand. A think-aloud study of 15 researchers documents the workarounds these users have built to manage what they see as unresolved confidentiality and output verification problems in tools including Research Rabbit and Elicit AI. The study, conducted by researchers at the University of Texas … More
The post AI prompt confidentiality and false citations worry researchers appeared first on Help Net Security.
This article has been indexed from Help Net Security
Read the original article: